Which of the following is an example of "False Light" in regard to privacy?

The concept of "False Light" in privacy law pertains to the portrayal of an individual in a misleading manner that creates a false impression about them. When an individual is misrepresented in a way that causes others to believe something inaccurate or untrue about their character, it can lead to damage to their reputation or emotional distress.

This misrepresentation does not necessarily have to involve outright defamation but focuses on creating a false narrative around the person's identity or actions. By depicting someone's character inaccurately, such as through manipulated quotes, images, or context, the audience may be led to form opinions or judgments that are entirely unfounded.

The other options do not align with the "False Light" doctrine. Publishing private facts pertains more to the intrusion of privacy rather than misrepresentation. Intentionally misleading a public figure can relate to various defamation claims but does not specifically address the false light aspect unless it misrepresents their character. Sharing copyrighted material without permission falls under copyright infringement issues rather than privacy violations. Thus, the option that aligns with "False Light" principles is the misrepresentation of someone's character to create a misleading perception.