What type of privilege grants immunity from libel suits to government officials?

Absolute privilege grants immunity from libel suits to government officials because it provides them with protection when they are performing their official duties. This privilege enables officials to speak freely and conduct discussions without the fear of litigation for defamation, thus fostering open communication within government processes. It recognizes the importance of uninhibited dialogue for the functioning of government and public interest.

In contrast, qualified privilege can offer some protection but does not fully shield individuals under all circumstances—it typically allows for statements made in specific situations, such as during official duties, but may still be liable if the statements are made with malice or without adequate research for truthfulness. This difference is crucial, as absolute privilege does not require such qualifiers, making it a stronger defense for government officials.

The other terms listed, such as defensive privilege and utilitarian privilege, are not established legal terms in the context of libel or defamation laws, which further confirms that outright immunity provided through absolute privilege is indeed the correct characterization of the legal protection for government officials.